128 is definitely enough, anything above that is well past human perception and is just wasting CPU cycles.

I'll figure out a system for it. Likely the way I said before.

I think that that would be a good idea. And as for the priority, if we end up having a static int value for it I would have it be a part of the command decorator, separate from the permission string. Something like respect_immunity=True, only allowing you to target people lower than yourself. Quite ...

1. We'll likely go for something like that, definitely have to consider it a bit more, however.

2. True, most places follow the convention of it being an "admin" system, even when its used by everyone. Being in the admins file gives you absolutely no permissions except those that you define.

1. Nothing is setup for that yet, I'll have to think about how best to handle that, if you have any ideas I would love to hear them.
2. Yes! That was certainly a very large part of the idea behind this system! Normal users, donors, etc

I'd be happy to help if you encounter any issues. It is an extremely simple system, however and 90% of the documentation for http://forums.sourcepython.com/showthread.php?808-SourcePerms applies to NewPerms as well.

This is a bit of an odd issue that popped up recently. We decided to ignore it for now, as the wiki is moving to a more permanent home soon. If the issue still occurs there we'll correct it.

__len__ is pretty explicitly for containers only. I don't see much benefit to doing len(vector) over vector.length, really.

I like it quite a bit! I almost argued in favour of names, then remembered just how bad of an idea it is to target players by name (especially partial name). I'm reasonably certain that most of the people (especially those who would target by name) who use these commands will use them through the ad...

It lacks the parentheses you mentioned, but I finally had the opportunity to set this up, unfortunately I can't decide which package it should go in. Filters.Players? A new module in Commands? (it is basically entirely used for command filtering) Anyway, here's the code. import re set_matching = re....

This should still work: https://github.com/necavi/sp_utils/blob/master/utils.py#L78

Yes this is possible, you'll have to attach the player's camera to another entity, likely and enable a screen overlay that makes everything black and white, it won't look terribly good but it might work.

There was talk of PyMySQL + SQLAlchemy but I wanted to make sure that everyone was onboard with it before adding them. Since then I've had almost no time to work on anything SP, unfortunately, but I'm entirely certain that these both could be added.

Which natives in particular are you missing?

I will have to look into that, thanks! I'm still not entirely certain that it'll do what I need, but I'm definitely going to explore it.

Changes to the DB would affect all bots at the same difficulty level and this is intended to be a dynamic system with vast changes during runtime. From what I have read thus far the profile is only read in once per map change which is insufficient for my needs.

Hello, I'm trying to figure out how to change the bot_profile values (typically found in bot_profile.db) for bots individually. It seems that there's a CCSBot->GetProfile() method but I'm unsure of how best to access it. This is intended to be used on a bot-by-bot basis so simply changing the bot_di...

I have always done so in the same tick with no issue, yes, that was the entire premise of this plugin, basically: https://github.com/necavi/Merx

Also you should never globally enable cheats, its best to strip the cheat flag from the intended command, run it, and then immediately put the flag back.

-strictportbind will cause it to error if it can't bind ports (e.g. 27015), default behaviour is just to try 27016 and so on.